CALENDAR
<<May 2013>>
SMTWTFS
2829301234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930311
2345678

Eagle Talk

Administrative Compensation

Question: Why are twenty six (26) administrators not contributing to their pension program? Why are we the taxpayers subsidizing them while teachers and support staff pay 10%? 

Answer: When we compare our administrative compensation to the four-county region, we are far below the average when we take into account the administrator's total compensation.  When hiring an assistant principal for the Junior High several years ago, our offers were rejected by several teachers because they made more in their current positions than they would make as an administrator in Milford.  Our administrative costs are far below state averages and the average of area districts that are rated excellent, and these figures are based on the only available data from the state which is the 2010-11 school year.  We cut four administrators last year, and Milford administrators have not had any raise in the last two years; so our administrative costs are now even lower in comparison to other districts.

If we took away administrators STRS compensation, we would have to pay them 10% more in salary, and we would continue to be far below the average salary for administrators in the state or in Southwest Ohio.

Tangible Personal Property Tax Losses

Question: The levy will generate $3.9 million, yet when I look at the spreadsheet from ODE on TPP loses, it shows only $1,578,335.72 annual loss. What am I missing here?

Answer: The spreadsheet on the ODE website for TPP you see is the reimbursement amount we are receiving in fiscal year 2012 which is the first year of the phase-out.  In fiscal year 2011 we received $2.7 million and in fiscal year 2013 we are to receive $454,000 (the second year of phase-out) and by fiscal year 2014, we will receive $0. 

The $4,449,000 in lost revenue was taken from the Actual 2011 receipts compared to the Estimated 2014 receipts on the five year forecast.  This is a tool used to help the district see what changes in funding are ahead and how to plan appropriately. Of that $4.5 million, the two largest areas where funding has or will end are budget stabilization ($1,337,000 received in fiscal year 2011) and TPPT ($2,701,000 received in 2011).  By 2014 neither of those revenue streams will exist.  The remaining $411,000 is a collection of smaller items.  The levy on the ballot will generate $3.9 million to cover the losses in state funding.  The district works diligently to raise local revenue to cover the costs of the smaller fluctuating items.   

What percentage of money goes to salaries and benefits?

Question: What I would like to know is what percentage of these monies will go to salaries, pensions and benefits.  Also, when was the last Teacher's Union contract ratified and what is the duration of the agreement/contract?  Based on the contract, what is the schedule of increases for teacher's salaries? 

Answer: To answer your question regarding how the levy money will be spent, this levy is literally to replace the state funding we will be losing.  That being said we will receive $1.9 million this fiscal year and $3.9 each year thereafter.  This money is not for a specific purpose, but to be used to cover the lean expenses incurred each year as part of the total budget.

 

The percentage of salaries and all benefits paid by the District last fiscal year was 73%.  Compare this to 2008 when the percentage of salaries and benefits was 78%.  You can see we have significantly reduced our staff costs. 

The current negotiated agreement with the MEA and MCEA covers 7/1/10 through 6/30/13.  The salary increase for school year 10/11 was 2%; 11/12, 1% and 12/13, 1%. Both unions agreed to waive all salary increases for one year extending the contract through 6/30/14.  This current contract also includes staff accepting an additional 2% of their insurance costs. 

Does the levy fund the preschool?

A portion of the monies generated from the levy will be utilized to cover costs for the preschool programs. Milford offers a Public Preschool program for typically developing three, four and five year olds both morning and afternoon sessions.  These programs are tuition based and with our Extended Day program, they pay for themselves in addition to the maintenance of the building in which they are housed (the former Miami Elementary on Rt. 28).  Milford also is required to offer special needs preschool classes to three, four and five year olds who have been identified with a developmental disability.  Federal and state funding supports some of this cost, but the Milford School District and all other public school districts in Ohio are required to provide the rest of the cost to support these students. 

 

Milford Schools help to reduce these costs by housing these classes in the same building as the other preschool classes and extended day are offered; so these other programs pay for the maintenance and support staff of the entire building.

 

Milford Schools also admits four typically developing students into each of these special needs classes to provide an inclusive environment that supports the development of all of the students.  These typically developing students’ families pay tuition which also helps to reduce the costs of these special needs classrooms for Milford Schools. 

 

 

How long do school levies last?

Question: School levies appear to be permanent. So, when we vote in a levy, are the taxes collected forever?  I was wondering because I've heard some people say that they thought a tax levy was supposed to "last" 4 years, but isn't that the money that's supposed to last the district that long, not how long the tax will be levied?

Answer: School districts generally run bond or operating levies. Bond levies are for a certain time period (commonly 23-28 years) and are typically used to construct buildings.  Operating levies can only be used for operational costs and "continue" to build over time. There are other types of levies, but these are the most common. (The levy on the November 6th ballot is an operating one).


With inflation keeping a steady 2% average over the last 10 years and higher inflationary costs being assessed for fuel, electricity, transportation, insurance and staff salaries, districts are forced to rely upon state funding and tax payers to cover the increased costs. The State recently cut funding to Milford (via budget stabilization and tangible personal property taxes) by $4.5 million forcing the district to turn to tax payers.

When you hear a levy will last four years, it is the funds that should carry the district through the next wave of increasing costs and inflation.  With the recent revaluation of properties, districts are taking a large hit as the value of a mill within the district has dropped drastically making the collections from a levy much less.  Property devaluation is unprecedented and making a huge impact across the state.

School districts, as per state law, are funded largely by the tax payers. There are very limited means for a district to raise local revenue and Milford has tried to pursue these avenues (shared services, open enrollment, tuition, building rental, etc.).  If Milford is allotted more funding through the state funding formula (which has not been decided by ODE for the current year and we are using prior year figures) or should additional revenue streams be received, the levy may last more than four years.

If the levy doesn’t pass, will bus service be cut?

Reductions in transportation are an option the Board will have to consider, but no decisions will be made until after November 6, 2012. For a full list of potential cuts, view the “Presentation on Potential Budget Reductions if Levy Fails” on the home page of our website. 

Tangible Personal Property Tax

Question: Would appreciate knowing what the TPPT amount was for the last year that Milford received the full amount from the state before it was phased out.  Has any of the CAT tax that replaced the TPPT come back to the district and if so, in what amount?   

Answer: The last year the district received the full amount of Tangible Personal Property Tax was fiscal year 2011, $2,701,000.  In fiscal year 2012, we received the reduced (phasing out) share of $1,578,000 and this fiscal year we are anticipating receipt of $454,000.  By fiscal year 2014, there will be no TPPT for the district.   

 

The district does not currently receive Commercial Activity Tax (CAT).     

 

The $4,449,000 in lost revenue was taken from the Actual 2011 receipts compared to the Estimated 2014 receipts on the five year forecast.  This is a tool used to help the district see what changes in funding are ahead and how to plan appropriately.   Of that $4.5 million, the two largest areas where funding has or will end are budget stabilization ($1,337,000 received in fiscal year 2011) and TPPT ($2,701,000 received in 2011).  By 2014 neither of those revenue streams will exist.  The remaining $411,000 is a collection of smaller items.  The levy on the ballot will generate $3.9 million to cover the losses in state funding.  The district works diligently to raise local revenue to cover the costs of the smaller fluctuating items.     

 

The district knew the budget stabilization was for two years and anticipated necessary cuts with a fiscal year 2012 Reduction Plan.  When the state chose to implement the TPPT phase out earlier than districts were originally informed and shortened the phase out to three years opposed to seven, the district knew deficit spending would begin sooner and hit harder. 

Please explain the ballot language on the levy amount.

Question: We are in the process of absentee voting and I'm trying to figure out why the ballot says a 4.5 mill levy amounts to a $0.45 tax on each $100 of home valuation. Some quick math says that ends up being $450 per $100k vs the $137 per $100k we saw in a recent mailing from the district. We support the levy at $137 per $100k and just need an explanation so we have confidence that is the correct number.

Answer: Our attorney drafts the language for the ballot which must state the 4.5 mills per $100,000 valuation. But valuation, does not take into consideration "assessed" valuation used by the county OR the adjustments for homestead rollback to determine property tax. The calculation: $100,000 X 35 percent is $35,000 assessed value. Assessed value $35,000 times 4.5 mills is $157,500 divided by $1,000 is $157.50 which is the gross tax. Then, take gross tax $157.50 X 12.5 percent for homestead and rollback adjustment of $19.69. Gross tax $157.50 less adjustment of $19.69 is $137.81. If you want to see how much the levy will cost you personally you can go to
clermontauditorrealestate.org and click on tab regarding levies for 2012.

Why does the district need a levy now? Can't it wait till next year?

The levy is critical because the district will be losing $4.5 million in funding from the State of Ohio, which is 7% of our budget. The levy is expected to generate $3.9 million annually (less than funding lost from the state). If the state funding cuts were not happening, Milford would not need a new levy because of the significant budget reductions we have made since the last levy passed in 2008.  In spite of budget reductions and conservative spending, Milford Schools will be in deficit spending in Fiscal Year 2013. A levy passed in November, 2012 will be collected in 2013 and is expected to last at least four years. If the levy is put on the May, 2013 ballot, we would not collect monies until April 2014, putting the district behind an entire year.

Elementary School Supply Lists

 All of the school supply lists are located under Quick Links on the home page of the website. The supply lists are also located on the home page of each school.
Send us a question or comment, and we'll give you the facts.

Recent Posts

Administrative Compensation
Tangible Personal Property Tax Losses
Does the levy fund the preschool?
How long do school levies last?
Tangible Personal Property Tax
Elementary School Supply Lists